Here’s the latest I can provide based on recent coverage up to now.
A petition against the Yadan law (anti-Semitism legislation) has drawn a very large number of signatures, surpassing 700,000, but the National Assembly’s Law Committee decided to classify the petition rather than debate it in plenary at that time. This raised questions about whether citizen petitions will be given a dedicated space in the legislative process versus being handled as part of the regular agenda.[2][3]
The petition’s high signature count did trigger procedural options (debate in the Assembly) under certain conditions, but the committee’s classification effectively curtailed a standalone debate on the petition while the underlying bill progressed on its own timetable. Reporting noted that the bill was slated for examination in mid-April, with continued attention from observers on how petitions influence or fail to influence legislative timing.[1][3]
Coverage from multiple outlets highlighted the tension between protecting civil liberties and addressing concerns around anti-Semitism, with critics arguing the measure could threaten freedom of expression and suppress legitimate discourse, while supporters framed it as a necessary response to anti-Semitic acts and rhetoric. The debate around the bill and the petition became a focal point for discussions about citizen oversight and parliamentary procedure in France.[3][8][9]
In late April, various outlets reported that the Assembly did not schedule a separate debate on the petition, as the Law Committee opted to classify it because the main text would be examined on the parliamentary schedule anyway; this effectively limits the petition’s direct impact on the chamber’s agenda for that cycle. However, petitions on the Assembly site remain a barometer of public engagement with controversial topics, even when not debated in plenary.[5][6][7][3]
For ongoing developments, keep an eye on: (1) official statements from the National Assembly about the petition’s status and any planned plenary debate, (2) subsequent legislative scheduling for the Yadan bill itself, and (3) reputable local and international coverage conveying the political and civil-liberties implications of this episode.[7][10]
Illustration: A simplified timeline
If you’d like, I can monitor for the latest updates and compile a concise, sourced update as new information becomes available.
En dépassant le seuil de 500.000 signatures, un débat devenait possible dans l’Hémicycle sur ce texte visant à lutter contre l’antisémitisme, à condition que la commission des Lois l’approuve.
www.lefigaro.frEn dépassant le seuil de 500.000 signatures, un débat devenait possible dans l’Hémicycle à condition que la commission des Lois cette instance l’approuve. Ce mercredi 15 avril, les parlementaires ont entériné le vote, estimant qu'un tel débat se télescoperait avec l'examen du texte...
video.lefigaro.frLe 18 fevrier 2026, une pétition intitulée"Non a la loi Yadan" a été déposée par monsieur Alexandre BALASSE. La commission des lois a décidé de nier cette initiative citoyenne et d'en nier la légitimité. Au delà de la question du texte de la petition, l'assemblée doit donner suite a cette interprélation légitime et réalisée conformément aux procédures prévues par nos institutions republicaines. Au nom du respcet de la République et de la Démocratie, l'assemblée nationale ne peut decider...
petitions.assemblee-nationale.frThe National Assembly will not debate the petition against the Yadan bill on anti-Semitism: the Law Committee voted on Wednesday, 15 April, for its ranking. Such a debate would be resounding with the review of the text scheduled from 16 April, she estimated.
ground.newsOn Monday evening, April 6, the petition against the proposed law "aimed at combating renewed forms of anti-Semitism" exceeded 400,000 signatures.
entrevue.frThe petition against the Yadan law exceeded 700,000 signatures, a level rarely reached on the platform of the National Assembly. However, the Law Committee decided to classify it, excluding the hypothesis of a specific debate in the Chamber. The decision is based on a procedural argument: the bill will be considered the next day in a public sitting. But the episode goes beyond parliamentary technique. He again raised the question of the real place accorded to citizen petitions and revived the...
en.libnanews.comLa proposition de loi Yadan, qui visait à élargir les délits de provocation et d’apologie du terrorisme et à sanctionner l’appel à la destruction d’un État reconnu par la France, a été retirée le 16 avril 2026 face à la mobilisation citoyenne massive (plus de 700 000 signatures).Pourtant, le gouvernement annonce déjà son intention de la représenter sous la forme d’un projet de loi gouvernemental avant l’été.Nous, citoyens attachés aux libertés fondamentales, refusons ce contournement...
petitions.assemblee-nationale.frPetitions to Assemblée nationale. Start a petition. Read their response.
www.change.orgA bill presented by MP Caroline Yadan was supposed to be debated last week in the Assemblée Nationale. But it was pulled from the agenda after a controversy over its content.
www.lemonde.fr